
College Football Rankings 2023: All 133 Teams
9-10 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Georgia | SEC | 2-0 | 0.98 |
2 | Michigan | B10 | 2-0 | 0.96 |
3 | Ohio St | B10 | 2-0 | 0.93 |
4 | Florida St | ACC | 2-0 | 0.91 |
5 | Penn St | B10 | 2-0 | 0.88 |
6 | Tennessee | SEC | 2-0 | 0.86 |
7 | Alabama | SEC | 1-1 | 0.83 |
8 | Texas | B12 | 2-0 | 0.81 |
9 | USC | P12 | 3-0 | 0.78 |
10 | Washington | P12 | 2-0 | 0.76 |
11 | Oregon | P12 | 2-0 | 0.73 |
12 | Notre Dame | 3-0 | 0.71 | |
13 | Utah | P12 | 2-0 | 0.68 |
14 | Kansas St | B12 | 2-0 | 0.66 |
15 | LSU | SEC | 1-1 | 0.63 |
16 | Mississippi | SEC | 2-0 | 0.61 |
17 | Oregon St | P12 | 2-0 | 0.58 |
18 | Oklahoma | B12 | 2-0 | 0.56 |
19 | Mississippi St | SEC | 2-0 | 0.53 |
20 | UCLA | P12 | 2-0 | 0.51 |
21 | Iowa | B10 | 2-0 | 0.48 |
22 | Duke | ACC | 2-0 | 0.46 |
23 | Clemson | ACC | 1-1 | 0.43 |
24 | TCU | B12 | 1-1 | 0.41 |
25 | North Carolina | ACC | 2-0 | 0.38 |
26 | Louisville | ACC | 2-0 | 0.36 |
27 | Minnesota | B10 | 2-0 | 0.33 |
28 | UCF | B12 | 2-0 | 0.31 |
29 | Cincinnati | B12 | 2-0 | 0.28 |
30 | Auburn | SEC | 2-0 | 0.26 |
31 | Wake Forest | ACC | 2-0 | 0.23 |
32 | Washington St | P12 | 2-0 | 0.21 |
33 | Miami FL | ACC | 2-0 | 0.18 |
34 | Arkansas | SEC | 2-0 | 0.16 |
35 | Pittsburgh | ACC | 1-1 | 0.13 |
36 | Kentucky | SEC | 2-0 | 0.11 |
37 | Wisconsin | B10 | 1-1 | 0.08 |
38 | Tulane | AAC | 1-1 | 0.06 |
39 | Syracuse | ACC | 2-0 | 0.03 |
40 | Texas A&M | SEC | 1-1 | 0.01 |
41 | Maryland | B10 | 2-0 | -0.02 |
42 | Florida | SEC | 1-1 | -0.04 |
43 | Missouri | SEC | 2-0 | -0.07 |
44 | Oklahoma St | B12 | 2-0 | -0.09 |
45 | South Carolina | SEC | 1-1 | -0.12 |
46 | Fresno St | MWC | 2-0 | -0.14 |
47 | Texas Tech | B12 | 0-2 | -0.17 |
48 | Michigan St | B10 | 2-0 | -0.19 |
49 | Illinois | B10 | 1-1 | -0.22 |
50 | Kansas | B12 | 2-0 | -0.24 |
51 | BYU | B12 | 2-0 | -0.27 |
52 | Air Force | MWC | 2-0 | -0.29 |
53 | NC State | ACC | 1-1 | -0.32 |
54 | James Madison | SBC | 2-0 | -0.34 |
55 | Purdue | B10 | 1-1 | -0.37 |
56 | UT San Antonio | AAC | 1-1 | -0.39 |
57 | Marshall | SBC | 2-0 | -0.42 |
58 | Memphis | AAC | 2-0 | -0.44 |
59 | Troy | SBC | 1-1 | -0.47 |
60 | SMU | AAC | 1-1 | -0.49 |
61 | Houston | B12 | 1-1 | -0.52 |
62 | WKU | CUSA | 2-0 | -0.54 |
63 | Colorado | P12 | 2-0 | -0.57 |
64 | California | P12 | 1-1 | -0.59 |
65 | Arizona | P12 | 1-1 | -0.62 |
66 | West Virginia | B12 | 1-1 | -0.64 |
67 | Boise St | MWC | 0-2 | -0.67 |
68 | Rutgers | B10 | 2-0 | -0.69 |
69 | Baylor | B12 | 0-2 | -0.72 |
70 | Coastal Car | SBC | 1-1 | -0.74 |
71 | Iowa St | B12 | 1-1 | -0.77 |
72 | Toledo | MAC | 1-1 | -0.79 |
73 | South Alabama | SBC | 1-1 | -0.82 |
74 | Wyoming | MWC | 2-0 | -0.84 |
75 | Appalachian St | SBC | 1-1 | -0.87 |
76 | Georgia Tech | ACC | 1-1 | -0.89 |
77 | Liberty | CUSA | 2-0 | -0.92 |
78 | Ohio | MAC | 2-1 | -0.94 |
79 | Ga Southern | SBC | 2-0 | -0.97 |
80 | Georgia St | SBC | 2-0 | -0.99 |
81 | San Diego St | MWC | 2-1 | -1.02 |
82 | Indiana | B10 | 1-1 | -1.04 |
83 | Virginia Tech | ACC | 1-1 | -1.07 |
84 | Vanderbilt | SEC | 2-1 | -1.09 |
85 | Nebraska | B10 | 0-2 | -1.12 |
86 | Southern Miss | SBC | 1-1 | -1.14 |
87 | Arizona St | P12 | 1-1 | -1.17 |
88 | W Michigan | MAC | 1-1 | -1.19 |
89 | Tulsa | AAC | 1-1 | -1.22 |
90 | Northwestern | B10 | 1-1 | -1.24 |
91 | Army | 1-1 | -1.27 | |
92 | Buffalo | MAC | 0-2 | -1.29 |
93 | E Michigan | MAC | 1-1 | -1.32 |
94 | ULM | SBC | 2-0 | -1.34 |
95 | UAB | AAC | 1-1 | -1.37 |
96 | South Florida | AAC | 1-1 | -1.39 |
97 | East Carolina | AAC | 0-2 | -1.42 |
98 | Navy | AAC | 1-1 | -1.44 |
99 | Texas St | SBC | 1-1 | -1.47 |
100 | Utah St | MWC | 1-1 | -1.49 |
101 | Ball St | MAC | 0-2 | -1.52 |
102 | Virginia | ACC | 0-2 | -1.54 |
103 | UNLV | MWC | 1-1 | -1.57 |
104 | San Jose St | MWC | 1-2 | -1.59 |
105 | North Texas | AAC | 0-2 | -1.62 |
106 | FL Atlantic | AAC | 1-1 | -1.64 |
107 | Miami OH | MAC | 1-1 | -1.67 |
108 | Louisiana | SBC | 1-1 | -1.69 |
109 | Connecticut | 0-2 | -1.72 | |
110 | Rice | AAC | 1-1 | -1.74 |
111 | Jacksonville St | CUSA | 2-1 | -1.77 |
112 | Stanford | P12 | 1-1 | -1.79 |
113 | Temple | AAC | 1-1 | -1.82 |
114 | Boston College | ACC | 1-1 | -1.84 |
115 | C Michigan | MAC | 1-1 | -1.87 |
116 | Louisiana Tech | CUSA | 2-1 | -1.89 |
117 | MTSU | CUSA | 0-2 | -1.92 |
118 | Bowling Green | MAC | 1-1 | -1.94 |
119 | Old Dominion | SBC | 1-1 | -1.97 |
120 | N Illinois | MAC | 1-1 | -1.99 |
121 | UTEP | CUSA | 1-2 | -2.02 |
122 | Kent | MAC | 0-2 | -2.04 |
123 | Colorado St | MWC | 0-1 | -2.07 |
124 | New Mexico St | CUSA | 1-2 | -2.09 |
125 | Sam Houston St | CUSA | 0-2 | -2.12 |
126 | Charlotte | AAC | 1-1 | -2.14 |
127 | Hawaii | MWC | 1-2 | -2.17 |
128 | New Mexico | MWC | 1-1 | -2.19 |
129 | Akron | MAC | 1-1 | -2.22 |
130 | Florida Intl | CUSA | 2-1 | -2.24 |
131 | Arkansas St | SBC | 0-2 | -2.27 |
132 | Nevada | MWC | 0-2 | -2.29 |
133 | Massachusetts | 1-2 | -2.32 |
Football isn’t just a sport; it’s a culture, a community, and a passion. And nothing quite ignites debates and discussions like college football rankings. But how do these rankings come about, and what’s the science behind them?
Introduction: The Evolution of College Football Rankings
Ah, the thrill of the football season! Fans eagerly await the weekly rankings, engaging in banter, pride, and sometimes, playful disputes. Understanding Computerized Rankings in College Football is vital for any fan. Why? Because the digital age has transformed everything, including our beloved football rankings. Now, algorithms and computations play an equally vital role as on-ground performances. Why Every Fan Should Be Paying Attention? Simply because understanding the nuances can give you bragging rights in every debate!
A Deeper Dive into Teams and Their Standings
- Texas Tech: Historically, they might not have been the behemoths of college football, but recent performances suggest a shift in winds. Can they continue to rise?
- South Carolina: Their strategy? Consistency. It’s what’s kept them in the limelight and will be their ticket to climbing the football rankings ladder.
- NC State vs. Coastal Carolina: While both teams come from different backgrounds, their unexpected rivalry is a treat for fans. Every matchup is a nail-biter, keeping fans at the edge of their seats.
- Boise State: It’s not just about Boise St. When you speak of them, you cannot forget their counterparts, Mississippi St. Their interlinked fates and performances have given fans countless memorable moments.
- Ole Miss and Mississippi State: Intrastate rivalries are the lifeblood of college football. These two teams exemplify that spirit. Their matchups are more than just games; they’re about pride, tradition, and legacy.
- Lesser-Knowns Rising: Teams like Northern Arizona and San Jose State might not always be in the spotlight, but recent performances suggest they’re teams to watch out for. Could they be the next big thing?
- The Southern Charm: South Alabama and Central State might not always be in the forefront of conversations, but their tenacity on the field demands respect and attention.
Teams to Watch Out For
- Florida State: After some hiccups, can they make a comeback? Rumors suggest their training regimen has undergone a complete overhaul.
- Ole Miss: They’ve always been lurking in the shadows, waiting for their moment. This might be their season to shine!
- James Madison & Ohio State: While one represents traditional powerhouses, the other is the embodiment of raw passion. Their games are a testament to what college football stands for.
The Intricacies of Ranking Systems
- Preseason AP vs. Current Rankings: We’ve seen teams like Notre Dame and Penn State fluctuate between these rankings. What causes these shifts? It’s a blend of on-field performances, injuries, and sometimes, sheer luck.
- Week 10 Predictions: As we approach the business end of the season, predictions are rife. Teams like North Carolina, Illinois, and Florida are on everyone’s radar. Will they live up to the hype?
- Unraveling The Mystery: The concept of teams “Receiving Votes†can be perplexing. While powerhouses like Kansas State and Oregon State consistently rank high, teams like Louisville and Pittsburgh are often on the cusp, waiting for their chance to break into the elite group.
Conclusion: The Road Ahead in College Football Rankings
As the season progresses, the intensity will only ratchet up. With teams jostling for top spots and players giving it their all on the field, fans are in for a treat. The rankings will ebb and flow, debates will intensify, and through it all, our love for college football will continue to grow. So, whether you’re cheering for Minnesota, Pittsburgh, Louisville, Kansas, Minnesota, Illinois, Florida, Kansas State, North Carolina, Ohio State, James Madison, Florida State, South Alabama, Ole Miss, Coastal Carolina, East Carolina, NC State, Texas Tech, South Carolina, Notre Dame, week 1 or celebrating Michael Pratt throwing for five touchdowns on week 1 in the season opener, remember, it’s not just about the score of just ranked teams or those others receiving votes like 1 James Madison, 3 Coastal Carolina 3, 7 Minnesota 6 Toledo, South Alabama 1 ; it’s about the journey not just the rankings or others receiving votes.
Note: Always trust in the passion and spirit of the game. No algorithm can truly capture the heartbeats of millions of fans. Football isn’t just numbers; it’s emotions, memories, and shared joys.
Related


College Basketball
2023-24 NCAA College Basketball Rankings: Top 180

College Basketball
Chicago State: Is this for Real?

College Basketball
All Time NET: A 5 Year Average

College Basketball
The Coaching Hot Seat 2023-24

College Basketball
2023-24 Top 100 Best College Basketball Players

College Basketball
2023-24 NCAA College Basketball Rankings: Top 180

College Basketball
2023-24 Top 100 Best College Basketball Players

College Basketball
2024 NCAA Tournament Bracketology

College Basketball
Summer Clearance: Bargain Bin Shopping in the Portal

More Featured
28.8%…The Michael Jordan 3 Point Debate

College Basketball
The Top 300 Returning Players
