There was a time not long ago where securing a JUCO commitment was one of the only ways to get an older more experienced player who presumably would be more ready from day one than many high school recruit. Fans often scoured the JUCO rankings 10 years ago for players that could immediately help, where as today it’s all about the portal.
While its prominence may not echo that of yesteryears, following the advent of 5th-year Prep schools, JUCO recruiting remains a resource of talent. Notably, the landscape has shifted with the newfound freedom for players to transfer at will, diminishing the trend of D1 athletes descending to JUCO ranks to circumvent mandatory sit-outs or preserve transfer eligibility, a practice prevalent over the past decade or so.
Players like Chad Baker-Mazara, last years #1 JUCO, who has navigated multiple transfers, or Kasean Pryor, who utilized JUCO as a strategic stepping stone, may perceive such strategies as less imperative in the current milieu. Consequently, the influx of D1 transfers into JUCO programs might dwindle now that you can transfer as many times as you like. However, this potential void could be offset by a surge in high school prospects who find themselves increasingly overlooked in D1 recruitment circles.
We’ve embarked on a retrospective examination of the top-ranked JUCOs in our recent rankings over the past two seasons and their subsequent performances. It appears that a significant portion of these players have transitioned into rotational roles, with the common observation being that it often takes a season for them to fully acclimate to the demands of higher-level competition.
A closer scrutiny reveals a higher rate of success among the 2022 JUCO class, which aligns logically with their additional year of maturity and many with at least one season of D1 experience under their belts. Many of these individuals have pursued further opportunities through transfers again, strategically seeking environments where they can showcase their abilities. Take, for instance, Tyrone Williams, the top-ranked player in the Class, who boasted an impressive 27 points per game average in JUCO. While his stint at Oregon didn’t afford him much court time, he has since found his stride at Old Dominion, carving out a respectable career with an average of 13 points per game.
| TRN Rank | Class | To | ADJeff 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Sincere Parker | 2022 | Saint Louis | 4.5 |
| 7 | Daniss Jenkins | 2022 | Iona | 4.4 |
| 2 | Sean East | 2022 | Missouri | 4.2 |
| 12 | Nae’Qwan Tomlin | 2022 | Kansas State | 3.9 |
| 36 | Jonathan Mogbo | 2022 | Mizz State | 3.9 |
| 4 | Mohamed Wague | 2022 | West Virginia | 3.7 |
| 14 | Da’Sean Nelson | 2022 | DePaul | 3.7 |
| 17 | Nick Pringle | 2022 | Alabama | 3.6 |
| 3 | Mohamed Diarra | 2022 | Missouri | 2.9 |
| 13 | Jaykwon Walton | 2022 | Wichita State | 2.9 |
| 8 | Dantwan Grimes | 2022 | Baylor | 2.8 |
| 16 | Jimmy Bell | 2022 | West Virginia | 2.7 |
| 33 | Bryant Selebangue | 2022 | Tulsa | 2.7 |
| 11 | Federiko Federiko | 2022 | Pitt | 2.5 |
| 23 | Brennan Rigsby | 2022 | Oregon | 2.4 |
| 24 | Pat Suemnick | 2022 | West Virginia | 2.4 |
| 15 | Deshawndre Washington | 2022 | New Mexico State | 2.3 |
| 10 | Blaise Keita | 2022 | Nebraska | 2.2 |
| 25 | Rashaun Agee | 2022 | Bowling Green | 2.1 |
| 18 | K.T. Raimey | 2022 | DePaul | 2.0 |
| 9 | Brian Moore | 2022 | Murray State | 1.9 |
| 19 | AJ Cajuste | 2022 | Stephen F. Austin | 1.9 |
| 1 | Tyrone Williams | 2022 | Oregon | 1.8 |
| TRN Rank | Class | To | ADJeff 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chad Baker-Mazara | 2023 | Auburn | 4.4 |
| 6 | Yaxel Lendeborg | 2023 | UAB | 4.2 |
| 29 | Jason Edwards | 2023 | North Texas | 3.2 |
| 19 | Oscar Cluff | 2023 | Washington St | 3.1 |
| 12 | Rob Whaley Jr. | 2023 | UNLV | 3.0 |
| 13 | Day Day Thomas | 2023 | Cincinnati | 3.0 |
| 7 | Kasean Pryor | 2023 | USF | 2.9 |
| 5 | Alejandro Vasquez | 2023 | UAB | 2.7 |
| 56 | Tre’Von Spillers | 2023 | App State | 2.6 |
| 20 | Christian Coleman | 2023 | UAB | 2.5 |
| 10 | Greg Gordon | 2023 | Iona | 2.3 |
| 8 | Trey Fort | 2023 | Mississippi St | 2.2 |
| 24 | Marcus Hill | 2023 | Bowling Green | 1.8 |
Conclusion
Indeed, the past two years have seen the emergence of several talented players from JUCO programs, yet the transition to higher levels of competition appears to yield mixed results. Unlike transfers from low-major or D2 institutions, projecting success from JUCO recruits seems to pose greater challenges. The certainty of success often associated with transfers from these backgrounds contrasts with the more unpredictable outcomes accompanying JUCO standouts, even those with impressive scoring records like averaging 20 points per game.
In our ongoing efforts to refine our ranking system, we’ve placed emphasis on identifying JUCOs competing in tougher conferences. These conferences tend to feature teams boasting numerous future D1 and D2 players. However, it’s worth noting that D2 teams often benefit from the presence of older, fourth and fifth-year players, which contributes to a balanced level of play. Despite JUCOs potentially harboring higher-level D1 talent, their rosters typically skew younger, introducing an additional dynamic to consider when evaluating their overall competitiveness.
Related
College Basketball
ADJeff College Basketball Player Ratings: OOC Wrap & Christmas Check-In
College Basketball
2025–26 Mid-Major College Basketball Rankings: Top 25 Non-P5 Teams
College Basketball
NCAA College Basketball (CBB) Top 25 Power Rankings
College Basketball
NCAA College Basketball (CBB) Top 25 Power Rankings
College Basketball
2026 College Basketball Mock Coaching Carousel: Our Predictions
College Basketball
College Basketball’s Deepest Sleepers: Bet These Teams Early
College Basketball
2025–26 Mid-Major College Basketball Rankings: Top 25 Non-P5 Teams
College Basketball
Under the Radar: The Players Being Overlooked 2025-26
College Basketball
Summer Clearance: Bargain Bin Shopping in the Portal
College Basketball
The Top 300 Returning Players
