NET Rankings
NET Rankings NCAA Evaluation Tool
Live and Sortable by Conference NET Rankings
Rank | School | Conference | Record |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Arizona | Pac-12 | 8-0 |
2 | Houston | Big 12 | 10-0 |
3 | BYU | Big 12 | 8-1 |
4 | Purdue | Big Ten | 9-1 |
5 | Creighton | Big East | 8-1 |
6 | Baylor | Big 12 | 8-0 |
7 | UConn | Big East | 9-1 |
8 | Marquette | Big East | 8-2 |
9 | Tennessee | SEC | 6-3 |
10 | Iowa St. | Big 12 | 7-2 |
11 | Princeton | Ivy League | 9-0 |
12 | Indiana St. | MVC | 8-1 |
13 | Oklahoma | Big 12 | 9-0 |
14 | Clemson | ACC | 9-0 |
15 | Texas A&M | SEC | 7-2 |
16 | Alabama | SEC | 6-3 |
17 | Kansas | Big 12 | 8-1 |
18 | Fla. Atlantic | AAC | 7-2 |
19 | Illinois | Big Ten | 7-2 |
20 | Wisconsin | Big Ten | 7-3 |
21 | Virginia | ACC | 8-1 |
22 | Colorado St. | Mountain West | 9-1 |
23 | Washington St. | Pac-12 | 7-1 |
24 | Auburn | SEC | 6-2 |
25 | New Mexico | Mountain West | 9-1 |
26 | Cincinnati | Big 12 | 7-1 |
27 | James Madison | Sun Belt | 8-0 |
28 | South Carolina | SEC | 8-1 |
29 | Mississippi St. | SEC | 7-2 |
30 | San Diego St. | Mountain West | 7-2 |
31 | Utah St. | Mountain West | 7-1 |
32 | Utah | Pac-12 | 7-2 |
33 | Gonzaga | WCC | 6-2 |
34 | Duke | ACC | 6-3 |
35 | Ohio St. | Big Ten | 8-2 |
36 | Miami (FL) | ACC | 7-1 |
37 | Grand Canyon | WAC | 8-1 |
38 | North Carolina | ACC | 7-2 |
39 | Kentucky | SEC | 7-2 |
40 | McNeese | Southland | 4-2 |
41 | Pittsburgh | ACC | 7-3 |
42 | Dayton | Atlantic 10 | 7-2 |
43 | Florida | SEC | 6-3 |
44 | Louisiana Tech | CUSA | 6-2 |
45 | Iowa | Big Ten | 5-4 |
46 | San Francisco | WCC | 5-3 |
47 | Drake | MVC | 8-1 |
48 | TCU | Big 12 | 7-1 |
49 | App State | Sun Belt | 5-2 |
50 | Northwestern | Big Ten | 6-1 |
51 | Villanova | Big East | 7-4 |
52 | St. John's (NY) | Big East | 6-2 |
53 | Nevada | Mountain West | 7-1 |
54 | Providence | Big East | 7-2 |
55 | Washington | Pac-12 | 6-3 |
56 | Liberty | CUSA | 6-3 |
57 | NC State | ACC | 6-2 |
58 | George Mason | Atlantic 10 | 7-2 |
59 | Butler | Big East | 8-2 |
60 | Colorado | Pac-12 | 6-2 |
61 | Texas | Big 12 | 7-2 |
62 | Virginia Tech | ACC | 7-3 |
63 | UC Irvine | Big West | 5-4 |
64 | Memphis | AAC | 6-2 |
65 | UCF | Big 12 | 6-2 |
66 | UIC | MVC | 5-3 |
67 | Oregon | Pac-12 | 6-2 |
68 | Southern California | Pac-12 | 5-3 |
69 | Kansas St. | Big 12 | 8-2 |
70 | Xavier | Big East | 5-5 |
71 | Duquesne | Atlantic 10 | 7-2 |
72 | Hofstra | CAA | 5-3 |
73 | Southern Ill. | MVC | 5-2 |
74 | Rutgers | Big Ten | 6-3 |
75 | St. Bonaventure | Atlantic 10 | 7-2 |
76 | Purdue Fort Wayne | Horizon | 8-1 |
77 | SMU | AAC | 5-4 |
78 | Nebraska | Big Ten | 7-2 |
79 | Michigan St. | Big Ten | 4-4 |
80 | Texas Tech | Big 12 | 6-2 |
81 | UMass Lowell | America East | 4-3 |
82 | Saint Joseph's | Atlantic 10 | 7-2 |
83 | Cornell | Ivy League | 6-2 |
84 | Ole Miss | SEC | 8-0 |
85 | Saint Mary's (CA) | WCC | 4-5 |
86 | Delaware | CAA | 5-3 |
87 | Longwood | Big South | 7-1 |
88 | Wake Forest | ACC | 6-3 |
89 | Portland St. | Big Sky | 5-2 |
90 | Massachusetts | Atlantic 10 | 5-2 |
91 | Boston College | ACC | 7-3 |
92 | UNC Greensboro | SoCon | 6-1 |
93 | North Texas | AAC | 4-3 |
94 | Toledo | MAC | 5-4 |
95 | Syracuse | ACC | 6-3 |
96 | Michigan | Big Ten | 4-5 |
97 | Missouri | SEC | 7-3 |
98 | Seton Hall | Big East | 5-4 |
99 | High Point | Big South | 6-3 |
100 | Charlotte | AAC | 5-4 |
101 | George Washington | Atlantic 10 | 8-2 |
102 | Wichita St. | AAC | 6-3 |
103 | Bradley | MVC | 6-3 |
104 | Tulane | AAC | 6-2 |
105 | Akron | MAC | 5-3 |
106 | Oakland | Horizon | 6-5 |
107 | Missouri St. | MVC | 7-3 |
108 | Davidson | Atlantic 10 | 6-3 |
109 | Arizona St. | Pac-12 | 6-3 |
110 | Youngstown St. | Horizon | 5-3 |
111 | Harvard | Ivy League | 6-3 |
112 | Arkansas | SEC | 6-4 |
113 | Evansville | MVC | 6-2 |
114 | Richmond | Atlantic 10 | 5-5 |
115 | Boise St. | Mountain West | 4-3 |
116 | Marist | MAAC | 6-2 |
117 | Prairie View | SWAC | 3-3 |
118 | Colgate | Patriot | 5-4 |
119 | Kent St. | MAC | 5-3 |
120 | Minnesota | Big Ten | 7-3 |
121 | Hawaii | Big West | 5-1 |
122 | Western Caro. | SoCon | 6-2 |
123 | UCLA | Pac-12 | 4-3 |
124 | Indiana | Big Ten | 7-2 |
125 | NIU | MAC | 4-4 |
126 | UNCW | CAA | 4-2 |
127 | Georgia | SEC | 6-3 |
128 | Wright St. | Horizon | 3-5 |
129 | Seattle U | WAC | 5-3 |
130 | VCU | Atlantic 10 | 4-5 |
131 | SFA | WAC | 4-5 |
132 | Drexel | CAA | 5-5 |
133 | Lipscomb | ASUN | 5-5 |
134 | Tarleton St. | WAC | 5-2 |
135 | Florida St. | ACC | 4-4 |
136 | Col. of Charleston | CAA | 4-4 |
137 | Vermont | America East | 6-3 |
138 | South Dakota St. | Summit League | 3-5 |
139 | Weber St. | Big Sky | 3-3 |
140 | Santa Clara | WCC | 6-3 |
141 | Belmont | MVC | 7-3 |
142 | Samford | SoCon | 5-2 |
143 | Loyola Chicago | Atlantic 10 | 5-4 |
144 | Canisius | MAAC | 5-5 |
145 | California Baptist | WAC | 4-2 |
146 | Long Beach St. | Big West | 5-4 |
147 | Penn St. | Big Ten | 5-5 |
148 | Oral Roberts | Summit League | 2-4 |
149 | Denver | Summit League | 4-4 |
150 | San Jose St. | Mountain West | 5-5 |
151 | Yale | Ivy League | 4-5 |
152 | Morehead St. | OVC | 4-3 |
153 | Monmouth | CAA | 5-4 |
154 | Georgia Tech | ACC | 5-3 |
155 | Utah Valley | WAC | 4-4 |
156 | New Hampshire | America East | 5-4 |
157 | Louisiana | Sun Belt | 3-4 |
158 | Tulsa | AAC | 5-2 |
159 | Oklahoma St. | Big 12 | 3-5 |
160 | Air Force | Mountain West | 7-3 |
161 | UNI | MVC | 2-7 |
162 | Utah Tech | WAC | 4-4 |
163 | Columbia | Ivy League | 5-3 |
164 | UT Arlington | WAC | 3-4 |
165 | Western Ky. | CUSA | 4-3 |
166 | Wofford | SoCon | 4-5 |
167 | Ohio | MAC | 5-4 |
168 | Southern U. | SWAC | 3-6 |
169 | Temple | AAC | 4-3 |
170 | Maine | America East | 7-4 |
171 | Saint Peter's | MAAC | 3-5 |
172 | Wyoming | Mountain West | 4-3 |
173 | Bowling Green | MAC | 5-3 |
174 | Norfolk St. | MEAC | 5-3 |
175 | LMU (CA) | WCC | 5-4 |
176 | LSU | SEC | 5-4 |
177 | UC Santa Barbara | Big West | 3-3 |
178 | Sam Houston | CUSA | 4-5 |
179 | North Dakota St. | Summit League | 4-4 |
180 | La Salle | Atlantic 10 | 8-2 |
181 | Georgia St. | Sun Belt | 3-5 |
182 | Maryland | Big Ten | 5-4 |
183 | UT Martin | OVC | 3-4 |
184 | Furman | SoCon | 3-5 |
185 | Merrimack | NEC | 3-6 |
186 | UAlbany | America East | 5-3 |
187 | North Ala. | ASUN | 3-4 |
188 | Radford | Big South | 5-4 |
189 | Nicholls | Southland | 2-6 |
190 | Penn | Ivy League | 4-5 |
191 | Stanford | Pac-12 | 4-4 |
192 | Illinois St. | MVC | 5-4 |
193 | West Virginia | Big 12 | 4-5 |
194 | Bryant | America East | 4-5 |
195 | ETSU | SoCon | 3-4 |
196 | Notre Dame | ACC | 4-5 |
197 | Northern Ariz. | Big Sky | 5-5 |
198 | Northern Ky. | Horizon | 4-5 |
199 | Oregon St. | Pac-12 | 5-3 |
200 | The Citadel | SoCon | 4-4 |
201 | Cal St. Fullerton | Big West | 4-4 |
202 | Iona | MAAC | 3-6 |
203 | UNLV | Mountain West | 3-4 |
204 | Gardner-Webb | Big South | 2-6 |
205 | South Fla. | AAC | 3-4 |
206 | Jacksonville St. | CUSA | 3-6 |
207 | Texas St. | Sun Belt | 3-5 |
208 | Howard | MEAC | 3-5 |
209 | Eastern Wash. | Big Sky | 1-6 |
210 | Cleveland St. | Horizon | 5-5 |
211 | Kennesaw St. | ASUN | 5-3 |
212 | San Diego | WCC | 6-4 |
213 | UC San Diego | Big West | 3-5 |
214 | Towson | CAA | 5-5 |
215 | Southern Utah | WAC | 2-6 |
216 | Chattanooga | SoCon | 4-3 |
217 | Northeastern | CAA | 4-6 |
218 | Little Rock | OVC | 4-5 |
219 | Saint Louis | Atlantic 10 | 5-5 |
220 | Winthrop | Big South | 5-3 |
221 | Fordham | Atlantic 10 | 4-5 |
222 | Montana | Big Sky | 2-4 |
223 | St. Thomas (MN) | Summit League | 4-4 |
224 | CSUN | Big West | 4-3 |
225 | Rhode Island | Atlantic 10 | 4-4 |
226 | Abilene Christian | WAC | 3-6 |
227 | Quinnipiac | MAAC | 6-2 |
228 | SIUE | OVC | 4-4 |
229 | Troy | Sun Belt | 2-5 |
230 | Murray St. | MVC | 2-5 |
231 | Tennessee St. | OVC | 3-3 |
232 | South Dakota | Summit League | 4-3 |
233 | Marshall | Sun Belt | 3-6 |
234 | Georgetown | Big East | 5-4 |
235 | Lamar University | Southland | 3-5 |
236 | Portland | WCC | 4-5 |
237 | Binghamton | America East | 5-4 |
238 | Fresno St. | Mountain West | 4-4 |
239 | Arkansas St. | Sun Belt | 3-7 |
240 | Alabama St. | SWAC | 2-4 |
241 | Pepperdine | WCC | 4-7 |
242 | South Alabama | Sun Belt | 4-4 |
243 | UNC Asheville | Big South | 2-5 |
244 | Queens (NC) | ASUN | 4-5 |
245 | Miami (OH) | MAC | 3-5 |
246 | Idaho | Big Sky | 4-4 |
247 | Bellarmine | ASUN | 1-7 |
248 | Brown | Ivy League | 2-8 |
249 | California | Pac-12 | 3-6 |
250 | Southern Miss. | Sun Belt | 3-4 |
251 | Idaho St. | Big Sky | 2-6 |
252 | UAB | AAC | 4-5 |
253 | Stetson | ASUN | 3-4 |
254 | Ball St. | MAC | 5-2 |
255 | Montana St. | Big Sky | 2-4 |
256 | Fairfield | MAAC | 3-6 |
257 | Boston U. | Patriot | 2-6 |
258 | Mount St. Mary's | MAAC | 3-6 |
259 | UTEP | CUSA | 3-4 |
260 | UC Riverside | Big West | 2-6 |
261 | Presbyterian | Big South | 5-4 |
262 | Elon | CAA | 4-4 |
263 | Jackson St. | SWAC | 2-7 |
264 | DePaul | Big East | 2-7 |
265 | Old Dominion | Sun Belt | 2-6 |
266 | Jacksonville | ASUN | 5-3 |
267 | ULM | Sun Belt | 2-3 |
268 | Rice | AAC | 2-6 |
269 | Bucknell | Patriot | 3-7 |
270 | East Carolina | AAC | 5-4 |
271 | Stony Brook | CAA | 3-5 |
272 | Austin Peay | ASUN | 2-6 |
273 | Kansas City | Summit League | 2-6 |
274 | Mercer | SoCon | 3-5 |
275 | Delaware St. | MEAC | 4-7 |
276 | Central Conn. St. | NEC | 2-6 |
277 | Green Bay | Horizon | 3-6 |
278 | Louisville | ACC | 4-5 |
279 | Texas Southern | SWAC | 0-7 |
280 | Western Ill. | OVC | 2-6 |
281 | Robert Morris | Horizon | 1-7 |
282 | Eastern Ky. | ASUN | 1-4 |
283 | Wagner | NEC | 3-4 |
284 | Navy | Patriot | 2-6 |
285 | FDU | NEC | 4-5 |
286 | UC Davis | Big West | 2-5 |
287 | North Dakota | Summit League | 4-4 |
288 | Vanderbilt | SEC | 4-5 |
289 | Middle Tenn. | CUSA | 4-6 |
290 | Northern Colo. | Big Sky | 2-4 |
291 | Dartmouth | Ivy League | 1-6 |
292 | Manhattan | MAAC | 3-5 |
293 | Eastern Ill. | OVC | 2-5 |
294 | A&M-Corpus Christi | Southland | 2-5 |
295 | New Orleans | Southland | 1-5 |
296 | Cal Poly | Big West | 2-7 |
297 | Valparaiso | MVC | 3-6 |
298 | UIW | Southland | 2-6 |
299 | FIU | CUSA | 3-7 |
300 | N.C. Central | MEAC | 2-7 |
301 | Florida A&M | SWAC | 1-4 |
302 | UTSA | AAC | 4-4 |
303 | Western Mich. | MAC | 2-7 |
304 | Bethune-Cookman | SWAC | 3-4 |
305 | Omaha | Summit League | 1-6 |
306 | American | Patriot | 4-6 |
307 | USC Upstate | Big South | 2-6 |
308 | FGCU | ASUN | 1-8 |
309 | UTRGV | WAC | 1-7 |
310 | William & Mary | CAA | 3-6 |
311 | Tex. A&M-Commerce | Southland | 2-6 |
312 | Eastern Mich. | MAC | 4-4 |
313 | North Florida | ASUN | 4-5 |
314 | Sacramento St. | Big Sky | 1-7 |
315 | Central Mich. | MAC | 3-6 |
316 | CSU Bakersfield | Big West | 2-5 |
317 | Lehigh | Patriot | 0-7 |
318 | Sacred Heart | NEC | 3-7 |
319 | Campbell | CAA | 2-6 |
320 | Milwaukee | Horizon | 2-6 |
321 | Tennessee Tech | OVC | 1-6 |
322 | Alcorn | SWAC | 0-7 |
323 | Chicago St. | DI Independent | 3-8 |
324 | Loyola Maryland | Patriot | 1-9 |
325 | Southeastern La. | Southland | 0-7 |
326 | Le Moyne | NEC | 1-7 |
327 | NJIT | America East | 2-7 |
328 | Lindenwood | OVC | 2-6 |
329 | New Mexico St. | CUSA | 1-6 |
330 | UMBC | America East | 4-7 |
331 | Ark.-Pine Bluff | SWAC | 1-7 |
332 | Rider | MAAC | 1-7 |
333 | Hampton | CAA | 1-5 |
334 | Alabama A&M | SWAC | 1-7 |
335 | LIU | NEC | 1-7 |
336 | VMI | SoCon | 0-8 |
337 | Niagara | MAAC | 1-6 |
338 | South Carolina St. | MEAC | 1-8 |
339 | UMES | MEAC | 1-6 |
340 | Lafayette | Patriot | 0-10 |
341 | Saint Francis (PA) | NEC | 2-5 |
342 | Southern Ind. | OVC | 0-9 |
343 | Southeast Mo. St. | OVC | 1-7 |
344 | Coastal Carolina | Sun Belt | 1-6 |
345 | Army West Point | Patriot | 1-8 |
346 | Northwestern St. | Southland | 0-8 |
347 | Detroit Mercy | Horizon | 0-9 |
348 | Morgan St. | MEAC | 1-8 |
349 | IUPUI | Horizon | 1-7 |
350 | Charleston So. | Big South | 1-5 |
351 | Ga. Southern | Sun Belt | 0-9 |
352 | Central Ark. | ASUN | 1-9 |
353 | Holy Cross | Patriot | 2-8 |
354 | Pacific | WCC | 4-7 |
355 | Buffalo | MAC | 0-9 |
356 | Grambling | SWAC | 0-6 |
357 | N.C. A&T | CAA | 0-8 |
358 | Stonehill | NEC | 1-10 |
359 | Houston Christian | Southland | 0-7 |
360 | Coppin St. | MEAC | 1-10 |
361 | Siena | MAAC | 2-8 |
362 | Mississippi Val. | SWAC | 0-9 |
NET Rankings
By Quad
By Conference
Men’s Basketball and NET Rankings: A Deeper Dive
Introduction to NET Rankings
Ever tuned into a men’s basketball game and wondered how those net rankings were determined? Well, welcome to the world of the NCAA Evaluation Tool, commonly known as NET.
What is the NCAA Evaluation Tool (NET)?
The NCAA launched this new ranking system as an evolution in assessing team performance. Unlike older systems, NET provides a comprehensive picture, factoring in multiple elements from game results to game locations and opponent ranking.
Why the new ranking system matters?
In the fluid landscape of college basketball, where every dribble counts, having an accurate and holistic ranking system is crucial. This is where NET shines, becoming an instrumental tool, especially when it’s March Madness season!
The Quadrant System Explained
A crucial part of NET is the Quadrant System. But what are these quadrants?
Quadrant 1: Home 31-75 Neutral, 51-100 Away
This is the crème de la crème. Wins here are gold. Think of it as playing against top-tier teams in high-pressure situations.
Quadrant 2: Home 31-75 Neutral
Still highly valuable, but slightly less intense than Quadrant 1 games.
Quadrant 3: Home 76-160 Neutral, 101-200 Away
Mid-tier games fall under this category. While wins are crucial, losses here can be significant setbacks.
Quadrant 4: Home 161+ and Neutral 201+
This quadrant represents the lower tier of games. Winning is expected for top teams, but an upset can drastically hurt a team’s net rank.
Breaking Down the Components
Team Value Index and its significance
In essence, the Team Value Index gauges the quality of a team’s wins. It’s an intricate balance, considering both who you beat and where you beat them.
Adjusted Win Percentage: What does it reveal?
This metric zeroes in on the team performance, revealing patterns in winning. Do teams fare better at home or away? It provides a clear snapshot.
Defensive Efficiency and Net Efficiency: The balance
Both components offer insight into a team’s defensive prowess. It’s not just about scoring; it’s about how well you can defend. A high defensive efficiency rating means you’re locking down opponents, while net efficiency evaluates the team’s overall balance.
The Importance of Game Location
Game locations, be it home, neutral, or away, significantly affect the NET ranking. High-pressure away games against top-tier teams are gold mines for boosting rankings, but they come with increased risks.
Team Sheets: A Snapshot of Performance
These are basically a team’s resume. Everything from wins, losses, to opponent’s free throw attempts can be found here. They provide a snapshot of how teams fare under different conditions.
NET Rankings and March Madness
Come March, all eyes are on the NCAA tournament. Predicting the landscape is no easy task, but with NET rankings, we have a reliable compass, guiding us through the chaos, helping in assessing teams based on their season-long performances.
Conclusion: The Evolution of College Basketball Rankings
From relying solely on win-loss records to now, delving deep with metrics like net efficiency, the world of men’s basketball rankings has evolved. And as fans, it only adds layers to our enjoyment, understanding the sport’s nuances as we cheer our teams on.
Moreover, the selection committee has shown a pronounced inclination towards the quadrant 1 games when determining the brackets for the NCAA tournament. This not only rewards teams for playing tougher opponents but also gives us fans thrilling games to watch.
Speaking of rewarding, the system takes into account offensive efficiency just as meticulously as its defensive counterpart. After all, a game where you score prolifically but allow just as many points can be as problematic as a low-scoring one.
Another crucial statistic? Opponent’s turnovers. In games I recall like the ones with scores 23-11 or 26-8, the ability of a team to force mistakes and capitalize on them made all the difference.
Now, while the top tiers, especially quadrant 1 home games and those in the neutral 1-50 away category, get a lot of attention, it’s worth noting that every game counts. Even matches that don’t seem to impact a national champion race or determine conference champions can play a pivotal role in NET rankings. A game at home 1-30 neutral can have as much impact on the team sheets as any big-ticket game.
To put this into perspective, consider this: A game where the score is 14-18 can shift the total points average of a team, affecting their rank. Games with scores like 5-27 or 17-15 might seem outliers, but they provide invaluable data, especially when analyzing close games.
Of course, there are certain scores, say 20-13 or 9-23, that resonate with fans due to their historical significance or sheer unpredictability. These numbers, like 26-9, 31-6, 8-23, 9-22, and 11-21, aren’t just statistics; they tell tales of underdogs triumphing or giants faltering.
Remember the game with a scoreline of 16-17? It was a nail-biter, emphasizing how even a single point can have monumental consequences, whether you’re aiming for a quadrant 1 home advantage or trying to bolster your standing in the eyes of the selection committee.
One important component often overlooked is the away games, even those that fall in categories like away 241. Every match, every point, every play contributes to the broader narrative, defining the journey of teams through the season.
Whether you’re analyzing scores like 19-14, 23-13, or 15-16, the NET system ensures that each data point, each game, and each moment is valued. After all, in the road to March Madness and the quest to be crowned the national champion, every dribble counts.
In Closing
With the ever-growing emphasis on analytics in sports, tools like NET rankings in college basketball serve as a beacon. They offer a comprehensive look into team performances, weighing in on everything from offensive efficiency to the ability to force opponent’s turnovers. For fans, players, and analysts, the NET system has added layers of depth, enriching the beautiful game of basketball.
NET has been around for 5 years now as the preferred tool of the NCAA selection committee. More elements than only winning percentage are included in the NET. It considers game outcomes, the difficulty of the opponent’s schedule, the venue of the game, the scoring margin, net offensive and defensive efficiency, and the caliber of victories and losses. It serves as both a predictive and results-driven metric.
After consulting with the Division I Men’s Basketball Committee, the National Association of Basketball Coaches, leading basketball analytics specialists, and Google Cloud Professional Services, the NET rankings methodology was upgraded in the summer of 2018.
The 2017-18 season’s late-season games, including those from the NCAA tournament, served as the initial test sets for a rating algorithm that made use of machine learning methods. The model was improved until it was as accurate as feasible by using it to forecast game results in test sets.
The NET makes advantage of that model.
A team’s first game counts the same as its 30th game because the NET rankings did not take into account the game order or date.
The NET will no longer use winning percentage, adjusted winning percentage, or scoring margin as a result of the modifications announced in May 2020. After consulting with Google Cloud Professional Services, which collaborated with the NCAA to create the original NET, the committee decided to make the alteration.


College Basketball
2023-24 NCAA College Basketball Rankings

College Basketball
Week 2 Thoughts: FAU, Mizz, Maryland

College Basketball
80’s Chaminade: Louisville and Virginia

College Basketball
2023-24 NCAA College Basketball Rankings

College Basketball
80’s Chaminade: Louisville and Virginia

College Basketball
Clash of the Rankings: Computers

College Basketball
Clash of the Rankings: Unpacking the Gaps in the AP and Coaches Poll vs Ours

College Basketball
Summer Clearance: Bargain Bin Shopping in the Portal

More Featured
28.8%…The Michael Jordan 3 Point Debate

College Basketball
The Top 300 Returning Players
